Autodesk fusion 360 vs inventor portable#
Fusion 360Īs a cloud-based tool, Fusion 360 aims to provide many features of Inventor, making it a lightweight, portable alternative. Direct modelling allows the designer to directly change faces and vertices of a model without worrying about cascading changes to its other components. Parametric modelling parametrizes different properties of the model, providing both the quantitative definitions necessary for a product destined for manufacturing as well as part configurability.
Freestyle (branded as Freeform) is used to organically shape objects like clay, meaning that models can be defined quickly and easily. Inventor supports the three traditional methods of 3D modelling: freestyle, parametric, and direct. Built upon its powerful modelling capabilities, Inventor has both native and additional tool-sets that aid in simulation, rendering, computer aided manufacturing (CAM), and product data management (PDM). InventorĪs Autodesk’s flagship 3D modelling tool, Inventor provides a host of features for all steps of a product’s development process. AutoCAD Mechanical also provides many specific industry-oriented features, such as automated bill of materials (BOM) creation. Its main purpose is to provide over 700,000 commonly used parts, ideal for any mechanical design work. Previously an addon for AutoCAD, AutoCAD Mechanical is now a native toolset for the base AutoCAD product. This platform lets users easily share CAD data, providing version control and in-browser previewing. Not surprisingly, AutoCAD has evolved greatly in 35+ years, now featuring a variety of modelling capabilities and interconnectivity with Autodesk’s overreaching cloud platform. This seemingly simple goal was revolutionary in its execution, moving every engineer’s workflow from pen and paper to mouse and keyboard. Older than Microsoft Windows, AutoCAD was Autodesk’s first product and was made with a very specific goal: to provide consumers the ability to create 2D schematics/drawings that can be easily edited. While other CAD programs existed, AutoCAD was the first of these programs to run on a personal computer, meaning that it could be easily distributed and used by educators, businesses, and individuals.Īutodesk has since expanded from their home in CAD, providing products for 3D modelling, design, simulation, animation, and even photorealistic rendering. While they might not have been the first of their kind, they became the primary brand associated with the industry, making these companies found within niche communities almost household names.Īutodesk was this pioneer in the world of computer aided design/engineering (CAD/CAE) when they launched AutoCAD in 1982. Inventor Studio is the animation environment of Autodesk Inventor Professional.Every industry has had its own set of pioneering companies who paved the way for all those who came after them.
Autodesk fusion 360 vs inventor professional#
How can I set Gravity, Forces, Friction, Contacts, Motion Laws into Fusion and port to Animation the way that I can with Autodesk Inventor Professional - Dynamic Simulation? (This represents a total of three 16-week long 5hr/week courses for me, that is, 240 hours of lecture/lab advanced level contact with students.) What animation functionality does Fusion have that Inventor does not have?ĭo you have any Screencast or YouTube sources of information on animation functionality that Fusion has that does not exist in Autodesk Inventor Professional? Fusion 360's cloud abilities make sharing a model in pretty good semi-realistic rendering quality a know about Fusion's ability to create animations better than Inventor There is no library concept available in Fusion 360.ĭrawings and BOM functionality still in infancy.Ī lot of these things above only matter to people that do mechanical design/engineering and that design machinery or machinery-like products.Īs a (product) concept design tool I find Fusion 360 compares favorably to Inventor as none of the above listed deficiencies make a difference. There are still no configurations in Fusion 360 and only more or less unproductive workarounds exist. That isn't a good thing IMHO because that means that both suffer from the same modeling problems.īoth share somewhat similar UI elements, such as the view cube, and some tools share the same concepts.
The one thing that Fusion 360 and Inventor share is the geometric modeling kernel ASM.
There can also be no doubt that Fusion 360 does not nearly have the depth and breadth of tools that are in these tools. There is no doubt that Autodesk Inventor and Solid Works are more mature tools than Fusion 360. Those comparisons and the judgements that go along with it - "It's getting up there" - are usually made by people that only use a small part of the functionality offered by these more mature tools and compare that functionality with the one in Fusion 360.
0 kommentar(er)
